The Terps kick off the ACC season on Saturday with a tough game at Clemson. That means that Maryland's early season stretch of too-close games against bad opponents is over. It would be really nice to see the athletic department schedule fewer cupcake teams each year, especially since those are the schools that always give the Terps heartburn.
Here's the Maryland Football schedule for this year:
Date | Opponent* | Result | Record | ||
Aug. 30, 2008 | Delaware | W | 14-7 | 1-0 | |
Sept. 6, 2008 | at Middle Tenn. | L | 24-14 | 1-1 | |
Sept. 13, 2008 | California | W | 35-27 | 2-1 | |
Sept. 20, 2008 | Eastern Michigan | W | 51-24 | 3-1 | |
Sept. 27, 2008 | at Clemson | 12:00 pm ET | |||
Oct. 4, 2008 | at Virginia | 7:00 pm ET | |||
Oct. 18, 2008 | Wake Forest | TBA | |||
Oct. 25, 2008 | NC State | TBA | |||
Nov. 6, 2008 | at Virginia Tech | 7:30 pm ET | |||
Nov. 15, 2008 | North Carolina | TBA | |||
Nov. 22, 2008 | Florida State | TBA | |||
Nov. 29, 2008 | at Boston College | TBA |
It's great that we scheduled Cal this year, but really, three games against Delaware, MTSU, and EMU is an embarassment. I know that all big schools schedule a lot of easy opponents (obviously MTSU wasn't easy enough), but Maryland would be better served by bucking the trend.
My ideal out of conference schedule would include standing home-and-home's against West Virginia (on hold while we play Cal for two years) and Penn State (who we haven't played since 1993 and haven't beaten since 1961). Those two regional rivalries would really help with recruiting as long as the Terps didn't get embarassed every year. But with the way Maryland gets killed in local recruiting by PSU as it is, losing to them couldn't hurt all that much.
The other two out of conference games could be scheduled against sucky teams from big conferences or good teams from sucky conferences. How does a Thursday night game against Boisie State sound? A trip to Northwestern? Baylor? Vanderbilt? Sure, some of those will be losses, but it looks a whole lot better than a loss to "Middle."
If I were in charge of scheduling, the Terps would certainly make it to fewer bowl games. But the bowl games we did make would be much better. Finishing at .500 with that schedule looks a whole lot better than the 6-6 we're hoping for this year. And really, who wants to go to the Congressional Bowl? Or the Meineke Car Care Bowl? I say shoot for the stars.
Another added benefit of my schedule would be additional national television exposure. As it stands now, there are far too many Maryland football games that aren't even on regional TV. If we were playing Penn State, do you think that game would go untelevised? There's a huge recruiting advantage gained by being on TV more. Just ask Fresno State.
Instead, we'll just keep playing crappy teams early in every season. We'll lose to some of them and have unimpressive wins against some of the others. Wouldn't it be nice to play some more meaningful games in September?
7 Responses:
Thanks for the link!
Also, does anyone have any idea why we ever would stop playing WVU? Those games are huge! And every so often we win one...
I agree that we should renew the rivalry with Penn St. and start one with Rutgers. We beat them last year, and we could do it again this year. Think what that would do for our recruiting in the Garden State.
Funny. I have the same complaint about Michigan. It is now a stated policy that Notre Dame will be our only home-and-home out of conference from now until eternity. Pathetic.
How about Navy? I think we are playing Navy next year, but I believe it is only a one time deal. The Navy game would be a good rivalry. We could just play it every year at Baltimore.
As much as I think playing Navy would be cool, it's a game we could lose, and it does nothing for recruiting or SoS.
牙醫,植牙,矯正,矯正牙齒,皮膚科,痘痘,中醫,飛梭雷射,毛孔粗大,醫學美容,痘痘,seo,關鍵字行銷,自然排序,網路行銷,自然排序,關鍵字行銷、seo,部落格行銷,網路行銷,seo,關鍵字行銷,自然排序,部落格行銷,網路行銷,牛舌餅,婚紗,台中婚紗,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭。
腳臭,腳臭,高雄婚紗,街舞,小產,雞精,性感,辣妹,雷射溶脂,雙下巴,抽脂,瘦小腹,微晶瓷,電波拉皮,淨膚雷射,清潔公司,居家清潔,牙周病,牙齒矯正,植牙,牙周病,矯正,植牙。
Post a Comment