September 6, 2007

Roger Federer and the Decline of American Tennis

I know this blog focuses on the major sports like football and baseball, but it's time to give a little credit to one of the best male athletes of the decade, Roger Federer. His record since the start of the 2004 season is 290-20 in singles matches, which has translated to 40 titles and 10 other finals appearances. 10 of those 40 titles have been majors (that's 10 of 15, and he's in the semis at the US Open). You may have noticed that he has won 40 of the 60 tournaments he's entered, finished 2nd in another 10, leaving only 10 with less impressive finishes. That's a 66.7% winning percentage. At 26, he has already set a new record for consecutive weeks at #1 (over 3.5 years), and is close to many of the grand slam records. The only blemish on his record is the lack of a French Open title, where he's been in the finals the last two years.

This is an incredible record of dominance in a very international, competitive sport. For comparison, Tiger Woods has 25 victories over the same period, including 5 majors, over a larger number of events. I think it's quite fair to state that Federer is the most dominant active male athlete in an individual sport. Federer's record is even more impressive when you consider the rigorous physical demands of tennis (flabby Phil Mickelson of a couple years ago wouldn't last a set).


Meanwhile, American tennis has bottomed out. After another loss at the hands of Federer, Andy Roddick has failed to win much of anything since the 2003 US Open. Only Venus Williams made the semis of this year's Open. Long gone are the glory days of John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors, Arthur Ashe and Chris Evert, Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi. Americans used to be among the best in the world. Even the forgettable Jim Courier spent a year at #1 in the 90's. The best American men this year are Roddick and James Blake. Roddick continues to be one of the best of the rest, while Blake finally broke his 0-9 streak in 5 set matches only to lose shortly thereafter. On the women's side, only the Williams sisters perform well, exclusively as a result of incredible natural talent. Yet laziness has kept either of them from staying at the top of her game for very long, allowing a woman with much less physical ability to surpass both of them. Justine Henin (5'5" and skinny) is #1 and has beaten Serena at all three majors they have both played this year. She will have the opportunity to show Venus the exit as well. It's sad to see such a waste of talent as the Williams sisters. Unfortunately the future is bleak as well, with no significant American star power on the horizon. Only the Bryan brothers in doubles represent American tennis well (#1 in men's doubles, 4 majors since 2005).

6 Responses:

michael said...

I agree. Federer is absolutely sick. Not sure if you guys got the chance to see the match last night (it didnt start until 10:15pm EDT...perfect for me on the west coast), but the first two sets were an absolutely amazing display of tennis. I don't think Roddick has ever played better in his life. Both men held on serve in both sets, and I don't even know if Roddick lost dozen service POINTS in twelve games. But alas, Federer prevailed in both tiebreakers before Roddick gave up in the third set. When one of the "best of the rest" (which is a monicker that I agree with) plays at his absolute best, and still cant even win a set, you know you are in the presence of greatness.

Federer certainly is one of the five best mens tennis players ever to step on the court. It's tough to judge him against Sampras, Becker, Lendl, and Borg in their respective primes (although most of them played against stiffer competition), but he certainly deserves to be mentioned right with them.

J-Red said...

Dude, did you even read the blog? Brien writes about America's Cup, Formula One, Horse Racing, and MMA. It's like he's that poor schmuck on ESPN.com that has to cover "Other Sports".

And Michael...ixnay on the olumncay poiliationsay.

J-Red said...

Roddick's best match was against Younes El-Aynaoui in the 2003 Aussie Open. Perhaps not his best-played, but the most entertaining tennis match I ever saw.

Benjamin said...

But I like the stuff Brien writes about! What's sad is that ECB probably has the best "other sports" coverage available in the US. All of my yachting and F1 sites end in co.uk .

Benjamin said...

Oh, and Roddick's best match was against Michael Chang in the 2001 French Open. 5 Sets, Roddick gimping and puking from severe cramps managed to beat one of the most gritty players in tennis history. I became a Roddick fan after blundering onto that match, and have slowly and disappointingly lost that excitement since. He's clearly been too busy being famous to take that willpower and devote it to tennis for the last 6 years. Now he's too old to really improve. In a way, Roddick is a microcosm of American sports, with the focus on celebrity, rather than true outright performance.

Jeffrey Dach MD said...

What is Roger's Secret Weapon?

Of course, Roger Federer is a gifted athlete, but could he have a secret weapon that gives him an edge on the tennis court? You might be surprised to know that Roger Federer makes use of gadget called a BEMER. This is a portable pulsed magnetic field device which speeds healing of muscle and tendons after tough tennis matches. According to the BEMER web site, Roger and many other athletes have been using portable pulsed magnetic therapy units regularly.

Read more at my Roger Federer Newsletter

Jeffrey Dach MD

Summer is here and there's never been a better time to try your hand at online sports betting. Place your bets on your favorite horse with horse racing or even try your luck with your favorite football team. Enjoying sport is just a click away!